20 July 2021 09:03 am Views - 206
Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) yesterday placed the Government of Sri Lanka’s Caa1 foreign currency long-term issuer and senior unsecured debt ratings under review for downgrade.
The rating agency said the decision to place the ratings under review for downgrade is driven by its assessment that Sri Lanka’s increasingly fragile external liquidity position raises the risk of default.
“This assessment reflects governance weaknesses in the ability of the country’s institutions to take measures that decisively mitigate significant and urgent risks to the balance of payments,” the rating agency said.
Moody’s in late September last year, downgraded Sri Lanka’s sovereign rating by two notches to Caa1 citing wide budget deficits, slow reforms and weak institutions.
Moody’s noted that although the government has secured some financing, mainly from bilateral sources, its financing options remain narrow with borrowing costs in international markets still prohibitive.
With the absence of large and sustained capital inflows through a credible external financing strategy, Moody’s expects Sri Lanka’s foreign exchange reserves to continue declining from already low levels, further eroding its ability to meet sizeable and recurring external debt servicing needs, and increasing balance of payment risks.
“Extremely weak debt affordability—with interest payments absorbing a very large share of the government’s very narrow revenue base— compounds the debt repayment challenge. The rating review will focus on assessing whether the sovereign is able to use a period of time provided by its current foreign exchange reserves and bilateral arrangements to implement measures that widen and increase its financing sources for the medium term, and thereby avoid default for the foreseeable future,” Moody’s said.
Meanwhile, citing the rationale for initiating the review for downgrade, Moody’s noted that Sri Lanka’s low and declining foreign exchange reserves adequacy, limited and narrowing set of external financing options for the government, and the extremely large share of government revenue taken up by interest payments, raises the risk of debt default. “The increasing fragility of the situation and continued worsening of credit metrics without decisive actions are indications that institutional credibility and effectiveness have weakened compared with Moody’s prior assessment,” the rating agency said.
“In contrast to the urgency of the situation—and notwithstanding the government’s stated commitment to repay its debt—Moody’s expects a credible and durable financing strategy to only materialise over a number of years,” it added.
Meanwhile, Moody’s expects the coverage by foreign exchange reserves of external repayments to continue falling from already low levels.
As of the end of June, Sri Lanka’s foreign exchange reserves (which in Moody’s definition exclude gold and Special Drawing Rights) amounted to just around US$ 3.6 billion, down 30 percent since the start of the year and insufficient to cover the government’s annual external debt repayments alone of around US$ 4-5 billion over the next 4-5 years.
“Taking into account plausible projections for the balance of payments, the country’s foreign exchange reserves will fall further over the next 2-3 years, unless Sri Lanka manages to markedly raise capital inflows,” the rating agency pointed out.
Moody’s baseline scenario assumes that the government and the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) will continue to secure some foreign exchange resources and financing support through a combination of projectrelated multilateral loans, official sector bilateral assistance including Central Bank swaps, commercial bank loans, and the divestment of some State-owned assets - though at a relatively slow pace.
Measures introduced by CBSL, such as the required sale of a share of all inbound remittances and export proceeds to the Central Bank, are also expected generate additional reserves, while capital flow management measures restricting imports and outbound remittances and investment will help retain some foreign exchange resources in the country.
However Moody’s pointed out that these measures can only shore up reserves temporarily and marginally as they also come at a cost to the economy.
Meanwhile, Moody’s said Sri Lanka’s current account deficit is likely to remain stable and relatively narrow compared to peers at around 1-2 percent of GDP over the next few years, with the gradual recovery of the tourism sector partly hampered by the ongoing wave of infections and border restrictions.
The rating agency also recognised potential for foreign direct investment to pick up with the development of the Colombo Port City and the government’s privatization plans, although amounts are likely to increase only gradually over time.
By contrast, Moody’s does not expect the government to enter into programme-based financing facilities with multilateral development partners at this stage, which the rating agency said significantly narrows the government’s external financing options.
“Furthermore, while the government has historically relied on international market access to finance its fiscal deficits and external repayment needs, borrowing costs remain prohibitive with Sri Lanka’s government bond spread to US Treasuries still very wide at more than 1600 basis points, compared to around 500 basis points before the onset of the coronavirus pandemic,” Moody’s noted.
Meanwhile, the rating agency pointed out that Sri Lanka’s long-standing fiscal weaknesses complicate the government’s policy choices.
Moody’s expects Sri Lanka’s economy to grow by around 3.5 percent this year, taking into account less stringent pandemic-containment measures compared to last year.
“Economic growth is likely to accelerate further next year on base effects and the reopening of borders, providing some boost to government revenue,” the rating agency said.
However, even with some revenue increases, Moody’s estimates that the government’s fiscal deficit will remain wide at around 9.5-10 percent of GDP this year and average 8.5 percent over the next two years. In turn, the government’s debt burden will likely rise further to around 110 percent of GDP over 2022-23, from around 100 percent at the end of 2020 and around 87 percent in 2019.
“Extremely weak debt affordability magnifies debt repayment risks. Interest payments exceeded 70 percent of government revenue in 2020 and will likely remain around 60-70 percent over the next few years - highest across sovereigns that Moody’s rates by some distance - even as revenue rebounds from very low levels,” the rating agency noted.
Moody’s expects the government revenue to remain around 10 percent of GDP over the next few years, unless the government’s efforts to enhance tax administration and impose special taxes can sizeably and durably expand its revenue base.
“While domestic resources have been sufficient so far to finance the government’s wider deficit in local currency, limited fiscal resources impose difficult policy choices to rationalise social spending and development expenditure, if interest payments continue to be prioritised.
Given very weak credit metrics, there is material risk that falling reserves precipitate a crisis of confidence, involving a negative spiral of a rapidly depreciating exchange rate, rising inflation, higher domestic interest rates, higher debt payments in local currency terms, and a weaker domestic economy. In this scenario, default risk would increase sharply,” the rating agency noted.
However Moody’s said the sovereign’s track record at securing some financing options, from foreign and domestic investors may keep such an adverse scenario at bay for some time.
“The rating review will focus on assessing whether the sovereign is able to use a period of time provided by its current foreign exchange reserves and bilateral arrangements to implement measures that widen and increase its financing sources for the medium term, and thereby avoid default for the foreseeable future,” Moody’s noted.