3 December 2021 09:40 am Views - 984
(1) The new free trade bloc of 15 states will be the biggest, surpassing both the US-Mexico-Canada agreement and European Union (EU). The total population of the RCEP is 2.1 billion people and accounts for 29 percent of global domestic production. The Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates the deal could increase global national income by US $ 186 billion annually by 2030.
(2) Salient features and perceived benefits under RCEP
(a) Consolidated rulebook for trade in all 15 member states: It provides harmonising the information requirements such as procedures for approved exporters to make declaration of origin, transparency around import, export and licensing procedures; issuance of advance ruling; prompt customs clearance and expedited clearance of express consignment; use of IT infrastructure to support customs operations; trade facilitation measures for authorised operators and local content standards for businesses to be eligible to the referential terms of the agreement within the RCEP to avoid the complexities and operational issues in each FTA.
(b) Introduction of Common Certificate of Origin: Generally, the cost of rules of origin ranges between 1.4 percent and 5.9 percent of the export transaction amounts. Common rule of origin could reduce export costs, thereby boosting merchandise exports among signatories by around US $ 90 billion on average annually (4 percent of 2019 intra-zone merchandise trade and 0.5 percent of global merchandise trade) Sources: UNCTAD, World Bank, Allianz Research
Undoubtedly, the signing of the RCEP is an achievement for China amidst the economic turmoil around the world, ongoing US-China trade tensions and emerging trade protectionism promoted by national governments. However, in effect the deal is likely to benefit not only China but also Japan and South Korea more than other member states, due to the enormous capacities of these countries.
(5) Winners and losers in global trade war
Trade is meant to create a win-win situation but global trade war produces winners, losers and naturally no exceptions for trade agreements. So, who will be the best loser when the RCEP works fully? The answer might be India and the USA. India was also part of the initial negotiations but it pulled out later over concerns that lower tariffs could hurt local producers. The question is, has India detected early warning signals? It is only the time that can prove it. However, some believe that if India joined the RCEP, sectors like pharmaceuticals, cotton yarn and the services industry can make substantial gains.
India has set an export target of US $ 1 trillion for 2025 and as a result, India is eying for early harvest agreements with a number of countries such as the UK, Australia, Israel, Canada and GOC countries. India’s recent overture to the EU to resume once stalled trade negotiations in 2016 could also be best explained in the light of the new challenges.
However, despite these measures, India can still consider joining the RCEP in the future. In this context, it’s good to remember the famous quote of Chanakya Indian teacher, philosopher and economist (350-275 BCE): “Learn from the mistakes of others you can’t live long enough to make them all your selves.”
(6) Distribution of total US exports in 2019
The RCEP marks another unusual happening in the history of trade. That is the absence of the United States of America from two major trade blocks of the world such as the RCEP and TPP. However, distribution of total USA exports show that the USA exported a sizable amount of goods (22 percent) to the RCEP countries before signing the RCEP. Can the USA continue this volume once the RCEP was made operational?
(7) Belt and Road (B&R) initiative
(7a) How does the B&R initiative help China’s economic and political goals?
The B&R initiative works in many ways to help China’s economic and political aspirations. Some of the notable features are switching development from the eastern coast to western parts of the country, which contributed only 7.8 percent of China’s total foreign trade by value in 2015, protecting China’s growing energy demand through smooth supply of crude oil mostly flowing from the Middle East through maritime connectivity, addressing the issue of over capacity of production, internationalisation of RMB and protecting geo strategic interest in Indian and Pacific Ocean, etc. This also includes economic corporation, building infrastructure and creating bilateral relations to revive the trading system along the ancient Silk Road.
China often says the B&R initiative has its roots in five principles of peaceful Co-Existence signed by India and China in 1954, the position of which however can be debated, due to the alleged military action of China in the border conflict in 1962.
(7b) Impact of B&R and South Asia: Economically least integrated SAARC countries, which have a population of 1.8 billion, representing 25 percent of the world population, needs such a strategic economic cooperation to uplift its economies and the quality of life of the people. It’s a well-known fact that South Asia struggles in attracting investment within the region. In the recent past, South Asia and South East Asia got the lion’s share of Chinese outbound FDI.
(7c) Challenges posed by the B&R initiative to China: Even though the B&R initiative is a success, it also faces some challenges internally and externally. The internal issues are absorption of overproduction during crisis situations like the pandemic, trade diversion through trade agreements by aid recipients and externally mounting pressure by political and civil activities on the issues such as depriving job opportunities for locals, increase in green field projects and issues over land clearance and alleged permission granted for military involvement to protect Chinese investments in South Asian countries, etc.
Despite China’s visionary B&R initiative, it still takes no chances but consolidating its local development too, to meet the global competition. In February 2019, China launched another initiative within its territories. It is the formation of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area (GBA). Under this move, China wants to strengthen the strategic development prototyping and fast engineering through creating synergies under one country two systems.
China’s efforts to build a formidable economy on its own land while flexing its muscles to win the trade war with the West through the B&R initiative and other measures like GBA remind us of a famous quote of ancient Chinese writer and philosopher Sun Tzu (544BC -496BC): “The good fighters of old first put themselves beyond the possibility of defeat and then waited for an opportunity of defeating the enemy.”
Today, in the southern and eastern parts of the globe, China has an unbeatable edge over the USA or EU on trade, due to the robust approach of its foreign trade policy and opportunities provided by regional trade agreements such as the RCEP and bilateral trade agreements signed with other countries.
(8) RCEP, regional trade agreements and trade policy implications for Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka is now in the process of formulating a new trade policy. In this context, Sri Lanka needs to be mindful of the latest trends and new developments taking place in the region, due to the RCEP or any other regional/bilateral trade agreements between China and other countries. At present, after India, China has already become the second biggest sourcing destination for Sri Lanka.
China’s imports from Sri Lanka record a nominal volume (US $ 252 million only (2020). China’s exports to Sri Lanka stood at US $ 3.58 billion in 2020. (UN COMTRADE). Sri Lanka’s main exports to China, as of 2020, were apparel, tea, paper yarn and woven fabrics, activated carbon, electronic integrated circuits and micro-assemblies, retreaded/used pneumatic tyres of rubber, fish frozen, etc.
In fact, except for Ceylon Tea, the RCEP members produce almost every product in the above list. Therefore, it is a moot point whether the policymakers have analysed the impact of trade in the RCEP vis-à-vis the ASEAN-free trade area and the implications thereof to Sri Lanka’s interests in the region.
Moreover, considering that the direction of Sri Lanka’s major markets are neither in the ASEAN nor in the RCEP, it is vital to conduct studies as to the trade competitiveness and compatibilities between the new markets of the far east, who are engaged in these regional agreements and Sri Lanka.
Now the interesting question is what will be the short-term and long-term impact on Sri Lankan exports to China and East Asia, due to the RCEP? The writer’s answer is even if Sri Lanka retains its market share in the short-term, Sri Lanka’s chances for future export growth to China and other RCEP countries can be substantially affected, if no remedial action is taken by Sri Lanka.
(9) Strategic approach and remedial actions available for Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka needs to first develop a strategy to retain the current export market share and secondly to develop a strategy to capture more export volumes through new markets.
Option (A): Use of Asia Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA) to promote exports to China. (APTA includes India, Bangladesh, South Korea, Laos, Mongolia as well)
(1) Sri Lankan government needs to address the issue of non-tariff barriers with China/India and win more concessions available under the APTA’s Special and Differentiated Treatment (SDT) and Small and Vulnerable Economies (SVE), both within an agreed time period.
(2) The Sri Lankan government can consider subject to the WTO compliances on the granting of subsidies and incentives/marketing arrangements for selected Sri Lankan products to enter into Chinese and Indian markets for a particular period.
(3) Aggressive trade awareness campaigns on the process, procedures and regulations specially involving exposition of Chinese language/provincial dialect for business communications/actual business practices in China could be arranged through Sri Lankan missions in China and elsewhere to meet buyers and sellers (need not be confined to Chinese market) to secure more volumes for Sri Lankan products. Available resources and the commitment of Sri Lankan Foreign Service and Commerce Department have to be effectively used through motivation and recognition. Inclusion of capable professionals from other streams may be a good option but what is finally important is building competences required to achieve the goal.
Option (B): (1) Negotiating an early harvest agreement to reduce the trade deficit gap as a precursor for any future comprehensive trade agreement: This approach is relevant especially to China and India, where already there is a big trade deficit unfavourable to Sri Lanka: This could take the form of a Bilateral Preferential Trade Agreement on Goods, which was earlier mooted between the two countries. The primary advantage of a Bilateral Preferential Trade Agreement (if negotiated under the Multilateral Trade Rules of GATT/WTO Enabling Clause) on goods over a more comprehensive free trade agreement that covers an array of sectors is that it takes into account the vast asymmetries existing between giant Chinese/Indian and Sri Lanka and to liberalise only selected sectors in keeping with its status as a small developing trading partner without undertaking vast scale liberalising initiatives.
(10) Suggestions to improve capacity of Sri Lanka’s trade
The writer welcomes the recent budget proposal to establish a National Single Window to reduce the cost of transaction and improve the efficiency for exporters and importers specially SMEs in the country. As a national priority, Sri Lanka also needs to rationalise the HS codes, which are very complex by nature, which put the country at a disadvantage at trade negotiations. Further, Sri Lanka needs to set up a national productivity commission that consists of experts and industrialists to address the issue of low productivity of our major industries.
(11) Framework for a new trade policy: Any future trade policy of Sri Lanka must have a robust and practical approach to solve the issue of exports to China and India and SME contribution to export. The writer suggests the Trade Ministry firstly to focus on export-oriented framework for foreign trade based on creation of wealth, technology, innovation, inclusiveness, investments and productivity. Therefore, any new trade policy document needs to provide provisions for a proper study on economic modelling for future trade agreements and assessing the overall export competiveness of Sri Lankan product offer and how good Sri Lanka in matching the competitors’ product offer comes from the RCEP or any other bilateral trade agreements signed by countries such as China and India. It’s also pertinent to have an impact analysis of the existing trade agreements, review of rules of origin to avoid circumvention and fraud, which happed in the past and future prospects. The country also needs to set up a high-powered national advisory committee for trade.
The writer also suggests approving a transparent procedural and regulatory infrastructure for implementation of Rules of Origin prior to FTA negotiations. The Sri Lankan government needs to provide proper guidelines for trade negotiation process and should not undervalue the International Trade Negotiations’ Toolkit developed by the Commerce Department in the past.
It is an apparent fact that when general trade negotiations are entered into by Sri Lanka at the behest of narrow geo-political interest without actually engaging in economic and pragmatic business outlook for such decisions. More often than not, “joint studies” are done merely to wrap up a decision to enter into trade agreements without conducting a proper analysis, assessment of the ground situation and cost benefit analysis.
It is also recommended to study the policies of other countries regarding trade agreements, giving a direction to the involvement of country legislature, selection of countries for agreements, appointment of negotiators, stakeholder consultation, provision for periodical review of the trade agreement, etc.
In fact, the checklist for Sri Lanka to upgrade the capacity goes on and on. E.g. Sri Lanka’s position in the global value chain (GVC), developing the country production capacity and the productivity. Further, a mechanism to promote a point of difference/overseas protection of branding for Sri Lankan products and services, (GIS) paying a ‘reward’ for encouraging innovation and a strategy to mitigate the ill effects of COVID-19, such as clearance issues at ports and freight rates, needs to be considered without hesitation. Finally, production of high tech items and extensive use of Exclusive Economic Zone at sea can create a change in Sri Lanka’s export landscape.
The new trade policy has to help Sri Lanka reach the required capacity to join a big league like the RCEP or sign effective trade agreements within a specific period. Signing any trade agreement without enhancing the country capacity will only result in another ineffective trade agreement like Indo-Sri Lanka Trade Agreement or South Asian Free Trade Agreement. Finally, it’s worthy to note the saying of Philip Hammond – British politician, chancellor of the Exchequer from 2016-2019 and Foreign Minister from 2014- 2016: “While I believe firmly in open markets and free trade, I also believe an open market needs a level playing field.”
(Ajith D. Perera (MBA – UK, EDBA – Sri Lanka, PGDA (UK) and Diploma in Credit Management – SL) is a scholar, writer and a speaker on trade and presently serves at the Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Sri Lanka (FCCISL), in the capacity of Secretary General/CEO. He was the founder of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, under the Asia Pacific Trade Agreement, which received the consensus of the APTA countries, at the 50th Standing Committee meeting held at UNESCAP in Bangkok in 2017. He also served on the constitutional review committee of the SAARC Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Pakistan from 2015-2016)