19 April 2021 09:22 am Views - 1397
The objective of this brief article is to present the key issues discussed at this virtual Engagement Week, as most of which are of contemporary importance for Sri Lanka being a beneficiary country of EU GSP scheme. The virtual GSP Engagement was attended by representatives of the European Commission, civil society, academia, industry and trade associations, as well as EU and beneficiary countries.
The conference provided a platform for interaction between the economic rationale and the perspective of the value of the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) and focussed on how the GSP can help economic diversification, what kind of opportunities it presents for EU producers, and how civil and environmental targets can be achieved in beneficiary countries.
The GSP hub plays a vital role in engaging stakeholders to increase the use of GSP, through bringing new EU investment, encouraging European companies to import from the beneficiary countries and promoting the related international sustainability standards. The GSP Hub maintains a website to facilitate the understanding of the GSP, its activities, and associated important topics, including specifics related to the EU’s GSP and a tailor-made monitoring database for facilitating the dissemination of information and building of an active feedback mechanism for stakeholders.
The virtual Engagement Week had five Webinar sessions focusing on the topics of the GSP and Export Diversification, the GSP and Green Economy, the GSP and Labour Rights, the GSP and Inclusive Growth, and the way forward on the trade policy review and the review of the GSP Regulation. The webinar sessions were organized with expert inputs followed by panel discussions.
The Vice President of the European Parliament, who is a Member of European Parliament (MEP) from Finland Heidi Hautala, inaugurated the GSP Engagement Week with a keynote address. She explained the object and purpose of the GSP and the need to further improve the scheme to be more effective in terms of helping the beneficiary countries. At this inaugural session Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to the European Union Grace Asirwatham participated as one of the panellists who contributed very pertinent and useful inputs to the discussion presenting the perspectives of Sri Lanka on a number of issues.
Sri Lanka was thankful to the EU for the support and cooperation extended to Sri Lanka under the Partnership Cooperation Agreement. Sri Lanka enjoyed Standard GSP since 1971 and it became a GSP plus recipient in 2005. However, due to certain shortcomings in the implementation of Conventions, the GSP plus benefits were withdrawn in 2010, yet Sri Lanka was able to regain the GSP plus in 2017.
GSP which is a non-reciprocal trade preferential arrangement helps developing and least developed countries to achieve sustainable development making use of tariff preferences for their exports to the largest consumer market in the world.
GSP plus concessions provide greater benefits to Sri Lanka to enter the EU market with zero or reduced tariff basis. Overall the EU GSP plus status has had a positive economic and social impact, in Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka was the first country to liberalize its economy in South Asia, to foreign trade and investment in 1977. As early as 1978 Sri Lanka strengthened the investment laws to make it more export–oriented FDIs and established an Economic Commission which is the current Board of Investment (BOI) to facilitate FDIs, oversee export processing zones and function as the One-Stop-Shop for Investments in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka also established the Export Development Board (EDB) in 1978. With these arrangements, Sri Lanka was emulating the industrial success of East Asian nations. Sri Lanka’s transformation from an agriculture-based society to a more industrial and services-based economy started with product diversification in the industrial sector with garments being the pioneer in that direction.
sector activities.
Yet, the Sri Lankan economy was less diversified, dependent on a handful of industries for its export earnings. Sri Lanka’s traditional export items are apparel, tea, rubber, spices, and coconut. Sri Lanka’s non-traditional exports of services such as ICT, tourism, and logistics have grown significantly in the last decade. These sectors have proven their ability to diversify and access new market destinations.
Until Brexit came into force, the EU was the largest export destination for Sri Lanka with Euro 3 billion worth of exports in 2019, of which Euro 2.5 billion were entitled to GSP plus tariff concessions. Sri Lanka’s GSP+ status has resulted in making the EU, Sri Lanka’s largest trading partnerahead of India and China. In the months following the regaining of GSP+ in 2017, Sri Lanka’s exports to the EU (calculated in Figure 1 below) increased by more than 12 percent (2019 compared to 2017). This included a doubling of the fisheries export under the EU GSP concessions, in response to a removal of the import ban on fish, and significant export increases in apparel, tea, tires, gems, motor vehicle parts and footwear.
However, Sri Lanka’s overall GSP utilisation level recorded at 62.75 percent in 2019, with the worth of Euro 1.6 billion actual exports under GSP concessions. There is varietyof reasons for the low-level utilization including lack of product and market diversification.
Third, focusing on the recent policy initiatives and program measures taken to promote exports and export diversification in Sri Lanka, the Ambassador encapsulated
the following;
The Sri Lanka government Budget for 2021 covered all economic sectors as per the Government National Policy Framework-Vistas and Prosperity.
The government has identified 5 main sectors and 17 subsectors, for development over the next five years. The five main sectors include manufacturing, information and communications technology, tourism, agriculture, and infrastructure.
A national trade policy is being formulated and a regional industrial zones development program to promote industries at the regional level was approved for action. Further, in order to diversify the export basket and empower the SME sector, the government proposed to establish 1000 Export Production Villages (EPVs)
around Sri Lanka.
The government budget for 2021 offered tax breaks for investments of $10m or more in the five strategic industries to encourage investors in the manufacturing sector for export diversification.
Within the EU, Germany, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, and Poland have been Sri Lanka’s main traditional markets and Sri Lanka is making efforts towards market diversification. Such efforts included a business focus on EU countries with which Sri Lanka had fewer trade connections, market surveys, business intelligence, and fact-finding activities, increased participation in trade and investment expos and business activities in those countries as well as decisions to establish resident diplomatic missions in Romania and Spain and appoint effective Honorary Consuls to facilitate trade expansion and market diversification.
Fourth, responding to the question on any measures that the EU should take to facilitate diversification of the export portfolio of beneficiary countries, including Sri Lanka, the Ambassador highlighted the following points:
The EU had funded a Trade- Related Assistance Project to develop a National Export Strategy, with a view to facilitating a strategic orientation to Sri Lanka to achieve an export-led economic growth path, make Sri Lanka a regional hub of value-added exports and promote linkages between various sectors and diversify its export basket and target new markets. The EU also helped to develop the SME sector which was identified as an important strategic sector for promoting growth and social development in Sri Lanka.
The exports to the EU are required to meet certain product standards and certifications compliance of which are expensive due to lack of capacities. The EU had helped Sri Lanka to establish a food control certification system and trained officials as part of capacity building assistance, in this regard.
Concerning the low-level of utilization of the GSP plus (See Table), the overall preference utilization rate in 2019 was only 62 percent. In other words, only 62 percent of Sri Lanka’s exports actually benefitted GSP+ preferences under the GSP scheme. As illustrated in the Figure, utilization rates were especially low for the textile, electrical and machinery sectors. While inherited domestic productive capacity constraints, common to many developing countries, have been the key reasons for lack of product diversification, a number of other external reasons have also prevented maximizing the benefitsof GSP scheme.
The most important one was the strict Rules of Origin criteria. For product diversification especially for manufacturing most GSP recipient countries including Sri Lanka had to depend on other countries for raw material and accessories. For textile and garments, the double transformation rule applies, that is, products must undergo two transformations in Sri Lanka to be able to meet the rules of origin criteria – from cotton to fabric, and from fabric to textile. Since Sri Lanka imports most of its textile from other countries for manufacturing apparel items for export to the EU, it has been an impediment to meet the rules of origin requirements.
The EU Regulation on the Rules of Origin (ROO) provided for cumulation arrangements such as Bilateral Cumulation, Regional Cumulation, Cross-Regional Cumulation, and Extended Cumulation. Cumulation rules of origin criteria allow Sri Lanka to claim originating status for components that do not originate in Sri Lanka but are used in the production process in Sri Lanka. Cumulation is possible with materials originating in countries that are part of Sri Lanka’s regional group: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal and Pakistan. Cumulation rules also apply between two regions such as SAARC AND ASEAN etc. It can also take place, under certain conditions, with materials originating in countries that have a free trade agreement with the EU. Finally, cumulation is possible with materials originating in the EU.
However, the approval procedure related to Cross Regional Cumulation was rather time-consuming or not given. Due to this reason, the exports with raw materials or accessories originating in other countries do not qualify for GSP plus tariff concessions. Further in the South Asian region, as countries are competing with each other, getting an Origin certificate for raw materials or accessories from those countries is also difficult to qualify under regional cumulation.
In this regard a case in point is the joint request submitted by Sri Lanka and Indonesia seeking approval under cross regional cumulation for raw material originating in Indonesia, which has been pending with the EU for nearly 3 years. Sri Lanka is also expected to submit a request for extended cumulation with Vietnam, against the backdrop of Vietnam’s recently signed free trade agreement with the European Union. To assist exporters from Sri Lanka, the EU GSP Plus guide prepared by the ITC (and available in Sinhala, Tamil and English) provides detailed insight into the requirements and regulations to be complied with in order to access the EU market under the
GSP+ scheme.
The double transformation criteria applied to apparel products originating from the beneficiary countries of General GSP and GSP Plus has adversely affected the GSP utilization and making the product diversification even more difficult. However, this criterion was not applicable to the beneficiaries of the GSP scheme “Everything-But- Arms” (EBA)extended to the Least Developed Countries (LDC). This is widely seen as a discriminatory application of ROO across the different GSP arrangements. For example, under the apparel sector, the General GSP and GSP Plus beneficiaries were bound to follow the yarn-fabric- apparel process which is double transformation while EBA beneficiaries follow only a single transformation such as fabric to apparel. The GSP plus was designed to be a special incentive scheme yet these discriminatory rules cannot be considered as incentives.
The international distribution of value chain activities such as design, production, marketing, distribution, etc., have become increasingly essential and inevitable in the global business. As the GSP beneficiary countries are also part of the value chains, the EU should consider allowing these activities under the ROO criteria for maximising the GSP benefits.
EU should also help to devise a mechanism for the GSP beneficiary countries to attract investments from the EU region and to find markets for services as part of the promotion of export diversification. The EU should also help beneficiary countries to digitalize the economies and strengthen e-commerce facilities.
Responding to a question on Sri Lanka adapting to green practices, the Ambassador very eloquently stated that Sri Lanka was one of the world’s most ethical sourcing destinations, particularly for apparel. Sri Lanka’s motto on apparel was ‘Garment without Guilt’. Sri Lanka has strong potential to enhance its external trade performance since her brands were increasingly associated with high quality and ethical manufacturing practices, focusing on Green concept, environmental safeguards and practices, and targeting zero child labour through pioneering ‘Child Labour Free Zones’.
Further, Sri Lanka was building an environmentally friendly fabrics zone, pushing for more green energy and better waste management. Sri Lanka wanted to ensure all companies operating in free zones to take advantage of green credentials when selling overseas. Sri Lanka also engaged in promoting exports of organic and fair trade exports. The Ambassador further said that Sri Lanka would like to join the campaign of the EU to make the GSP green for which necessary support by way of capacity building and resources from the EU is required.
Further, Ambassador Asirwatham also took the opportunity to comment on the GDP per capita-based graduation criteria pertaining withdrawal of GSP benefits. As per the current GSP rules, one of the GSP Plus eligibility criteria was to remain at a lower-middle-income level and upon graduating to upper-middle-income status and after maintaining the new income level for three consecutive years the GSP benefits withdrawal process will be initiated with an additional adaptation time. On this issue, the Ambassador presented a valid opinion that the withdrawal should not be done solely based on GNI figures and the EU should also consider other aspect of economic vulnerabilities and the actual developments on the ground.
As the final point, Ambassador Asirwatham highlighted the fact that the GSP tariff advantages would erode in time to come as the EU was entering into FTAs and other bilateral trade arrangements with larger and emerging economies, especially in the Asian region. This would result in affecting the GSP beneficiary countries by way of additional competition to find market opportunities and investments.
The issues raised and suggestions presented at this engagement were well received and discussed during the virtual conference. Ambassador Grace Asirwatham was the only Ambassador who was engaged as a panellist in theweek-long Engagement on GSP by the GSP HUB
in Brussels.
Besides the points discussedat virtual conference hosted by the GSB HUB, the following two important developments
need attention;
Brexit
Roughly 30 percent of all Sri Lanka’s GSP+ exports are destined to the United Kingdom (UK). Specifically, based on 2019 statistics, they consist of apparel, textile and footwear; rubber and plastic articles; machinery; and coffee, tea and spices.As of January 1, 2021, exports destined for the UK are no longer covered by the EU GSP scheme; rather, they are covered by the UK’s GSP scheme. Considering that the UK is a major trading partner for Sri Lanka, it would be important to closely monitor developments relevant to the UK’s
GSP scheme.
The UK’s current GSP largely mirrors the EU’sGSP scheme: it contains three frameworks, which correspond to the three arrangements in the EU GSP system. Specifically, it includes a Framework for the Least Developed Countries (LDC), which corresponds to the EU’s EBA arrangement; the Enhanced Framework, which corresponds to the EU’s GSP Plus arrangement; and the General Framework, which corresponds to the EU’s Standard GSP scheme. Countries that are GSP Plus beneficiaries under the EU GSP Plus framework automatically qualify to receive preferences under the Enhanced Framework. It must be noted, however, that differences apply with respect to the tariff lines subject to tariff reductions.
2023 expiry of EU GSP regulation
The regulation that governs the current GSP scheme expires on 31 December 2023. Currently, on the basis of an evaluation of the effectiveness of the GSP scheme, discussions are ongoing regarding the future of the EU GSP regulation, with a number of different options and scenarios on the table: a continuation of the scheme as is; a discontinuation of any GSP arrangement; and fine-tuning the existing regulation (https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2020/february/tradoc_158624.pdf).
The Commission is currently preparing a proposal for the review of the current GSP scheme. This proposal is expected to be adopted by the second quarter of 2021, once approved by the Parliament and Council. It is most likely that a new GSP regulation will be adopted in 2023 that will incorporate various amendments, including updating the list of 27 conventions that must be complied with as a condition to receive GSP Plus preferences, the product graduation threshold, the safeguards mechanism and an examination of the relationship between GSP and EU Free Trade Agreements.