13 September 2022 12:05 am Views - 173
‘Memories from the Margin’ was a project by the Social Cohesion Thematic by the Centre for Poverty Analysis funded by the Think Tank Capacity Building grant implemented by the University of South Carolina Rule of Law Collaborative. “The project was a call to include voices from the margins in the reconciliation narrative. We worked with a group of 25 youth from Verugal and Santhosapuram off Trincomalee in the East Coast. They were trained as co-researchers and the exercise was to bring out the narrative history and the post-war experience of the Palankudi community. We did an initial scoping and on the second visit we trained them with disposable cameras, the research ethics and how to conduct interviews,” said Thamindri Melissa Aluvihare, Senior Research Professional at CEPA.
‘Memories from the Margin’ was a project by the Social Cohesion Thematic by the Centre for Poverty Analysis funded by the Think Tank Capacity Building grant implemented by the University of South Carolina Rule of Law Collaborative.
The images detailed various issues that they face from livelihoods to poverty, assimilation, erasure of culture, scarcity of water to militarisation and were mounted in a way that brought out the concept of margins as means of prompting viewers to look at the narrative. “Most of these stories arise from the fact that they have not been identified – that they haven’t had the legal and institutional recognition as the Palankudi people. While the narrative was birthed from the community itself, the researchers have then triangulated the research and given conceptual definitions and the academic background to it. For example, in places where they spoke about Buddhistisation and militarisation, we would include the term militarisation even if they were talking about it in effect,” Aluvihare added.
The impacts of assimilation were highlighted through these images portraying how the current culture is erasing since they have assimilated to the dominant Hindu culture in the area. “Assimilation eventually leads to erasure and even the language has been erased over the generations. People who speak their language is way over the age of 80 and not mobile enough for us to preserve the language. The identity issue also compounds on other social issues as well. For instance they have the traditional knowledge to carry out indigenous methods of farming, foraging and agriculture but they are not permitted to do that because they are not recognised as indigenous people by the Forest Department. Those who have access to it aren’t doing their job properly and it eventually leads to deforestation,” Palansuriya continued.
Another excerpt from their messages reads as follows; “The indigenous people should be recognised and indicated in law books as ‘Palankudi’, ‘Mootha Kudi’ or ‘Aadhikudi’ which are honourable names of indigenous people.” “One of the issues is that over the years, Palankudi has become a derogatory term and therefore, identifying as the Palankudi community has become derogatory. “As a first thing what they told us was that they didn’t want to be identified with this term. They gave us two words, Palankudi and Aadhikudi – Palankudi means oldest community and Aadhikudi means first community but they use Palankudi more regularly. The stigma comes with assimilation since they have been assimilated as the lowest cast,” Aluvihare explained further.
Once the team identified their story, the initial research methodology was amended so that it brings out the spirit of the community. In fact it was more important for the people to preserve their history. The village comprised more women than men since the men have been victims of the war. Many were missing, disappeared or dead. The researchers believe that they have laid the foundation to take this project forward and see that this community is granted the rights exercised by every other citizen on this land.