27 September 2016 01:01 am Views - 11381
Sarees and loose garments are permitted; skirts and sleeveless tops are not. Parents who failed to comply have been turned away in the past. This is utter bunkum. The Education Minister finally called it bluff. Issuing a circular, he instructed (Quite rightly) that schools could not decide what parents should wear. The logic is simple, parents are legal adults, no less legal citizens, than school authorities.
Flaunting morality is an industry- size pastime in the countries of our region, and it is not unique to us. (In Africa, Governments which fail in basic civil duties such as vaccinating kids, are unholily bothered about ‘evils of homosexuality’)
Thus school authorities who are otherwise sane and rational people might have been compelled to
But, the downside of that argument is that children will nonetheless be exposed to the same, when they step out of the school gate.
Incongruous means to insulate kids from the real world, where they live, could well have unexpected sinister repercussions.
Arab countries, that lock up their female folks in closed doors, and behind the all- encompassing Burkas, have created a pervasive sense of misogyny, and sexual frustration among their young men.
For decades social scientists have argued that single –sex schools are reinforcing gender stereotypes and institutional sexism. Most of us who studied in boys boarding schools, could see, though grudgingly, an iota of truth there (Though at the same time, we could insist that those factors alone do not make a convincing case against single –sex schools)
School authorities penchant to ‘parent’ parents of their students is neither new, nor unique to Colombo schools. Some schools in the provinces only let saree clad mothers into their premises.
Those guidelines could well date back to the cultural awakening that predated our Independence.
However, now in retrospect, one should be able to note that certain things that coincided with the early renaissance movement were not exactly rational, they were at times divisive, and of course out of touch, with a cosmopolitan nation that Sri Lanka is trying to become.
And our schools cannot live in the past. They need to discard archaic regulations. However, it is not only those regulations that are out of date; our school syllabuses are not the most enlightening.
Perhaps the Government should get practitioners from education success stories (such as Singapore), to revamp them. Teaching strategies for core subjects such as Mathematics, Science and English may not be the most effective.
After studying English for 13 years, most students leave schools barely proficient in the language. That deficiency over the time results in social and income disparities multiplying, since English is a crucial source of upward mobility.
Those are obviously far more acute problems that need to be fixed. Women exposing a bit of flesh is not.
This however is a manifestation of a wider problem. Policy elites in our part of the world have a
The Cultural Minister of the former regime once proposed to ban women wearing miniskirts, he later gave up when he realised the folly of his proposition.
In some other places in Asia, authorities are getting busy enforcing morality and religiosity. In Indonesia, there is a renewed interest in making sure Muslim female students wear the religious garment, while in Malaysia, Police are raiding motels to catch adulterous couples. Those policies, wherever they are implemented are distractions from real social problems.
The world has come a long way since the days, when those Puritanical Victorian values dictated public lives.
We too as a country have moved along, even unbeknownst to us. Once in a while, those archaic regulations remind us how the past we left behind looked like. However, trying to shovel those leftovers of the past down our throats is also a problem that we encounter from time to time. Those regulations have to go for that they make the present uncomfortable and the future less promising.
Insulate kids from the other gender, there is more likelihood, no matter how remote it is, that they end up being less tolerant of the other gender.
Well intentioned measures to protect kids from outside evil do not need to be overprotective, and by extension, counter-productive.
However, still children need to be protected from a host of evils, from rapists to drug peddlers; they also need to be motivated and guided to achieve their full potentials.
School authorities should spend their time and energy in those areas, where assistance is most needed. They fail to do that in the best of their abilities, when they are busy with enforcing archaic laws.