1 February 2023 12:02 am Views - 411
Rather creative would you say. But I did not write a word of it. ChatGPT did. I just gave it a simple command – write a limerick on #Gota and
ChatGPT is the publicly available AI model unveiled in November last year. It has any one overseeing word-based content in a twist because of its plagiarism capacities – anyone can just get ChatGPT to write their assignments. Worse plagiarism detection programmes that are currently available are still not primed to detect ChatGPT aided content.
And this fellow is so advanced it will make Google quaint. Here is an example, I asked Google this ‘what is a digital flak-jacket’. It gave a bunch of results on high-end flak-jackets including one for a high-tech canine flak-jacket.
I asked the same question from ChatGPT and it gave me this “A digital flak jacket refers to steps taken to protect one’s online identity and privacy. These can include using strong passwords, enabling two-factor authentication, avoiding public Wi-Fi, and being cautious about sharing personal information online.” Not precise but closer to what I was looking for.
The remainder of this column is ChatGPT and me talking to each other through a screen.
ChatGPT is the publicly available AI model unveiled in November last year. It has any one overseeing word-based content in a twist because of its plagiarism capacities – anyone can just get ChatGPT to write their assignments
Q Can we detect content drafted with the help of ChatGPT?
A. Here are several methods to detect content generated with GPT-based language models like ChatGPT:
Check for language patterns: Generated text can often have repetitive language patterns or syntax errors.
Use plagiarism checkers: These can detect large chunks of text that match existing sources.
Check for coherence: GPT-generated text can sometimes lack coherence or have inconsistencies within the content.
Use GPT-detection tools: There are tools that have been specifically created to detect GPT-generated text.
Note: However, keep in mind that as the technology advances, it may become more difficult to detect generated text, so these methods may not always be foolproof.
Human journalists bring unique perspectives and insights to their reporting, and AI has yet to develop the capacity for these traits
Q How could AI be manipulated to produce works of journalism?
AI can be used to assist in the production of journalism in a variety of ways. Some examples include:
Automated news writing: AI can be trained on a dataset of news articles and then used to generate new articles on a similar topic. This can be useful for routine or time-sensitive stories, such as reporting on company earnings or sports scores.
Data analysis: AI can be used to analyse large datasets and identify patterns or insights that might be difficult for a human journalist to uncover. This can be useful for investigative journalism or data-driven reporting.
Content curation: AI can be used to scan the web and select articles or videos that are relevant to a specific topic or audience. This can be useful for creating a personalized news feed or generating a list of recommended articles for a reader.
However, there are also potential dangers and ethical considerations associated with using AI in journalism. For example, if an AI system is trained on biased data, it may produce biased or inaccurate output. Additionally, using AI to generate content could lead to job loss and further displace human workers. It is important to approach the use of AI in journalism with caution and consider the potential consequences.
It also reassured me.
AI can be used to scan the web and select articles or videos that are relevant to a specific topic or audience. This can be useful for creating a personalized news feed or generating a list of recommended articles for a reader
Q Will AI make human journalists obsolete?
No, AI cannot completely replace human journalists. While AI can assist with certain tasks such as data analysis and fact-checking, it lacks the human elements of empathy, creativity, and cultural context that are essential in journalism. Human journalists bring unique perspectives and insights to their reporting, and AI has yet to develop the capacity for these traits.
And finally, I asked ChatGPT to write a headline for this article.
“Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of ChatGPT in Journalism”
I asked it to make the headline a bit sassy.
ChatGPT Shakes Up Journalism: To Replace or Not to Replace Human Journalists?
Then I asked it to make it bit sexier. And boom
“ChatGPT’s Sizzling Impact on Journalism: Revolutionizing or Reinforcing Human Touch?”
The writer is a journalism researcher and the Project Lead at the Dart Centre Asia Pacific. He can be contacted on amantha.perera@cqumail.com