Reply To:
Name - Reply Comment
SC holds W.D.Lakshman, Cabraal, S.R. Atygalle, Kumarasinghe violated public trust
COLOMBO (Daily Mirror) - While holding the guilty persons’ liable and naming them, including one member of the Monetary Board, the Supreme Court in its recent judgment regarding two fundamental rights petitions filed over economic crisis, decided not to make any adverse decisions or orders against two Monetary Board members President’s Counsel Dr. Sanjeeva Jayawardena and Dr. Ranee Jayamaha.
The Supreme Court in its recent judgment regarding two fundamental rights petitions filed over economic crisis, has decided not to make any adverse decisions or orders against two Monetary Board members President’s Counsel Sanjeeva Jayawardena and Dr. Ranee Jayamaha.
Instead, the Supreme Court, by its majority decision held that former Central Bank Governors Prof. W.D. Lakshman, Ajith Nivard Cabraal, former Treasury Secretary S.R. Atygalle and Monetary Board member Samantha Kumarasinghe had violated the public trust.
At the forefront of the judgment of the Supreme Court, the Court has clearly stated that Leave to Proceed was not granted against Sanjeeva Jayawardena, P.C and Dr. Ranee Jayamaha, the Members of the Monetary Board.
At the end of the judgment as well, the Court identifies the exact parties against whom adverse declarations and orders are made and one appointed member of the monetary Board, Samantha Kumarasinghe has been made liable, and the Court has not made any adverse decisions or orders against Sanjeeva Jayawardena PC and Dr. Ranee Jayamaha.
In their judgment, the Supreme Court had quoted extensively from the oral submissions made by Sanjeeva Jayawardena PC, including how the 600 billion of taxes had resulted in massive impairment to domestic revenue mobilisation and Treasury operations and in downgrading of sovereign ratings and bank ratings and preventing access to foreign capital markets and aggravating the Balance of Payments Crisis.
The Supreme Court also notes that the minority on the Monetary Board, being Sanjeeva Jayawardena PC and Dr.Jayamaha, had agitated the importance of imposing meaningful exporter conversions, restrictions on non-essential imports, 150 percent LC margins, in order to prevent dollar leakages as well as an urgent IMF programme, and the dire situation of the foreign reserves not permitting the Central Bank to use its reserves to defend the exchange rate.
The judgment makes specific reference to the revelations made by Sanjeeva Jayawardena that on 6th April 2022, pursuant to the Parliamentary Committee on Public Finance, how one of the members of the said Committee, urgently requested Sanjeeva Jayawardena to have a one-on-one meeting to fully brief the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa of the actual, critical situation of the reserves. The judgment states that in preparation for this meeting, Jayawardena had obtained statistics with regard to foreign reserves and the inflows expected and the outflows that would be imminent, due to the upcoming debt service deadlines and the expected further decline of the reserves and the need for an IMF anchor. The judgment goes on to refer to Jayawardena’s important revelation that the original letter that the then President had sent to the IMF on 18th March 2022, was ambiguous and no request had been made in that letter for a full EFF programme and was cryptic, and that hence, mixed messages were being sensed by the IMF. The judgment states that at the meeting, Jayawardena had fully briefed the President on all aspects and had informed him that that there is no other option for the country, but to secure a fully-fledged Fund Supported Programme from the IMF.
The judgment explicitly notes that on the suggestion of Jayawardena, the President had agreed to send a completely fresh communication to the IMF, requesting a full IMF programme.
Accordingly, on 7th April 2022, the letter facilitated by Jayawardena, had been signed by the then President, seeking a full IMF Fund programme, and sent to the IMF and on the following day, a follow on letter was sent to the IMF by the new Governor, thereby facilitating and paving the way for the GOSL to formally announce the broad debt standstill on 12th April 2022. The Court has also found that the Monetary Board External Debt Monitoring Committee, Chaired by Dr. Sanjeeva Jayawardena and Vice- Chaired by Dr.Ranee Jayamaha, had made a very critical contribution and had made numerous, strong recommendations and it had repeatedly highlighted the urgent need for an IMF programme, in order to prevent a disorderly sovereign default and BOP crisis, and preserving gross official reserves and exchange rate stability, through a credible, multilateral anchor.
Comments - 40
Recommended
You May Also Like
