MP Gamlath feeds false fears on Resolution 30/1

19 March 2020 12:10 am Views - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} 2 Bookmark

A A A

To check this claim, we evaluated the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Resolution 30/1 and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

These sources indicate that:

(1)Resolution 30/1, co-sponsored by Sri Lanka and adopted by the UNHRC, does not make any reference to an international court; nor does it grant any power to the UNHRC to refer any person to an international court; nor does the UNHRC have any general power to refer any matter to an international court.

(2)The only international court which has jurisdiction to deal with criminal responsibility of individual persons is the ICC. However, Sri Lanka is not a signatory to the Rome Statute of the ICC. The UN Security Council (UNSC) is the only body that has powers to bring individuals from non-signatory countries to the ICC. The ability of the UNSC to do so is not affected by Resolution 30/1.

We conclude from the above that Resolution 30/1 does not change the status quo of how Sri Lankans could be referred to the ICC or any other international court.

Therefore, we classify the MP Gamlath’s claim as FALSE.

FactCheck is a platform run by Verité Research. For comments, suggestions and feedback, please visit www.factcheck.lk.

Comments - 2

Lanka Peiris Saturday, 21 March 2020 08:18 PM

If Resolution 30/1, co-sponsored by Sri Lanka and adopted by the UNHRC, and does not grant any power to the UNHRC to refer any person or matter to an international court - What are they messing with this resolution like leeches wasting time and money?

0 0

Lanka Wednesday, 01 April 2020 09:24 PM

If Resolution 30/1 does not change the status quo of how Sri Lankans could be referred to the ICC or any other international court are they not bound to refer it to the security council? China, Russia will use their veto power! US will not support the "cess pit" UNHRC. India will do a lip!

0 0

Add comment
Comments will be edited (grammar, spelling and slang) and authorized at the discretion of Daily Mirror online. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.