• If the retirement rule is implemented as planned, a total of 305  specialists, including 70 doctors who will turn 63, will be forced to  retire
• Medical specialists argue there is a legitimate expectation for an extension of their services

By Sheain Fernandopulle   

In a highly anticipated decision, the Court of Appeal will announce its ruling on the early retirement of medical specialists on November 17.   

This comes after a total of 176 doctors filed Writ Petitions against the Cabinet’s decision to make medical specialists retire at the age of 60.   

The Health Ministry had previously extended the service period of medical specialists in the State service to 63 years of age. However, the Health Secretary issued a circular stating that this decision would only be effective until 31 December 2024.   

Medical specialists argue that there is a legitimate expectation for an extension of their services.   

The current shortage of medical practitioners poses a significant challenge in providing equal healthcare access across all state hospitals. Presently, there are 790 specialist vacancies, and there are 1,985 specialists functioning in state hospitals. This indicates a considerable increase compared to the previous 400 to 500 vacancies that needed to be filled.   

Moreover, the expansion of specialities and the upgrading of state hospitals and units require approximately 3,000 medical specialists by 2024 to ensure satisfactory healthcare services.   

If the retirement rule is implemented as planned, a total of 305 specialists, including 70 doctors who will turn 63, will be forced to retire. This would further reduce the number of medical specialists in service and exacerbate the existing shortage. As such, the Court of Appeal’s decision on 17 November will have far-reaching consequences on the availability and quality of medical specialists in state hospitals.