Ragging in Sri Lankan universities has overshadowed many bright futures and even cut short young lives full of potential. Deaths have been reported as a consequence of ragging since 1974. It is also a criminal act according to the Prohibition of Ragging  and other forms of violence in Educational Institutes Act No  20 of 1998. Yet, this manic form of violence continues unabated in Sri Lankan universities, despite the appalling stories which unfold from time to time. The following is the commencement speech delivered by former President of the Sri Lanka Medical Association, Consultant Physician Dr. Anula Wijesundere to the new medical entrants in the 150th year of the Colombo Medical School, and at the foundation sessions of the Sri Lanka Medical Association (SLMA) in 2020.

I wish to draw your attention to a subject that is very close to my heart and a subject that causes much concern to most civic minded people  . This problem has also caused untold misery to all families affected: “Violence in the universities of Sri Lanka”.

I will begin with the saga of  Pasindu,  an  undergraduate of the  Faculty of Management of the University of Sri Jayawardene.  The young boy, at the threshold of a bright future was wilfully hit by a massive tractor tyre which was rolled down the staircase when he was climbing down, as part of the sadistic joy of ragging associated violence. We are all aware of the terrible consequences.

Pasindu lay unconscious in the Intensive Care unit of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka for many months, during which time he had several brain surgeries to correct the massive brain damage he sustained following intense brain haemorrhage. He survived largely due to the competence of the neurosurgeons and the excellent nursing care he received. However, he was left with residual weakness of limbs and an unsteady gait. We all fervently hope that Pasindu will be able to complete his education and will improve  further from the residual neurological deficits he has at present.

Pasindu was certainly not the first and obviously will not be the last to be subjected to ragging as long as this culture of violence is allowed in our universities. The drastic consequences that this terrible malady has had on the university system must be emphasized to realize the stark consequences.

Pasindu was indeed unlucky to be ragged in such a ghastly manner by his immediate seniors. Possibly they were envious of  Pasindu as he came from an upper middle class family, had good knowledge of English & Information Technology  and was an excellent sportsman from St Peters College and a popular all rounder.  In fact, Pasindu was brimming with all the  features that  most ragging seniors detest in freshers.

Consequences of  ragging in universities

1. Over 2,000 students selected for universities have abandoned their careers.
2. At least 18 students have committed suicide.
3. Many students have become partly or totally paralyzed, attempting to escape from aggressors. 
4. Hundreds suffer from depression, anxiety & stress syndromes.
5. Current victims of violence invariably become the aggressors the following year. 

What is ragging?  

Ragging is a criminal act according to the law. Ragging is a deliberate act which causes physical, psychological or sexual  stress or trauma. This invariably leads to humiliation, harassment and intimidation. Ragging also leads to psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety and stress situations,
From - Prohibition of Ragging  and other forms of violence in Educational Institutes Act No  20 of 1998.
 As ragging in universities continued unabated, Prof Mohan de Silva, during his tenure as Chairman, University Grants Commission, appointed  Prof. Uma Coomaraswamy  as the Chairperson of the Centre for Gender Equity / Equality for Prevention of Sexual and Gender based Violence and Ragging, of the University  Grants Commission. 
The findings of the committee are indicated below

1. Sex & gender based violence is mainly perpetrated against female students, especially against under privileged students from remote areas.
2. Includes physical, sexual, verbal and psychological harassment .
3. Results - physical violence 12 %, verbal violence 13% and sexual violence 13%.

As a result of establishment of this centre, the following help lines have been provided to students (who have been ragged or wish to prevent ragging,) to lodge complaints.

1.  Director of UGC Centre for Gender Equality/ Equity :  on  + 94  11 305 6885./
2 .Vice Chancellor / Registrar of university in writing or in person.
3. UGC call Centre  on. +94  11  212 3700
4. UGC ragging complaints portal on  www.ugc.ac.lk/rag
5. Use of “Emergency Safety app”, to make immediate call for help. 
6. The Police

Consequences of ragging

It is well known that ragging causes hatred, crushes self esteem, instigates negative attitude and leads to mental and physical trauma . Unfortunately, the victims of ragging during the current year often become the aggressors the next year. Thus, ragging or violence in Sri Lankan universities is a vicious  cycle , which needs to be stopped as early as possible. to promote healthy learning and prevent the drastic consequences.  
In this context, one can wonder why ragging has not yet been eliminated from the Sri Lankan university system. This unfortunate state has happened due to the following reasons

1. Lack of concern or awareness among the public 
2. Apathy among the professionals, even university lecturers 
3. Inactivity by Vice Chancellors, especially politically appointed VC’s, fearing strikes and closure of universities 
4. Deans, lecturers and administrators of universities 
-neglect or ignore ragging 
despite knowledge 
-accept ragging as a normal occurrence

So far, the only silver lining in the tragedy of ragging has been the action taken by the Vice Chancellor of the Ruhuna University, Professor Sujeewa Amarasena. Seventeen students who engaged in ragging, were charged, remanded and subsequently expelled from the university. It was subsequently found that the Peratugami Organisation, a breakaway extreme leftwing group of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna were mainly responsible for the strikes in the universities.  However, it is gratifying to note, that despite the stern action taken against the aggressors, the University of Ruhuna functioned normally. This debunks the myth that action against raggers would lead to strikes by university students.

The Peratugami Organisation

This is a highly organized breakaway group of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, which controls students, often holding them to ransom. They select mostly students from financially deprived families in remote areas. In certain instances, ragging starts even before the university academic year begins. The freshers are programmed to obey orders of seniors and prevented from attending classes in English & IT. This will certainly deprive them of good employment opportunities in later life.
Role of the Sri Lanka Medical Association (SLMA) in prevention of ragging in universities -
An expert committee on prevention of ragging in universities was formed in 2019, with Dr. Tara de Mel, former Secretary of Education as the Chairperson and ten highly motivated members. The terms of reference for this committee were formulated by Dr. Tara De Mel.

1. Identify accurately the nature of violence in the universities
2. Assess accurately the toll it has taken on the entire higher education system
3. Identify the measures that the authorities have taken to stem the tide
4. Identify the reasons why the universities have failed to eradicate this problem
5. Identify impediments to implementing action against the perpetrators
6. Identify measures to be taken to prevent violence the following year
7. Need to delegate responsibility of eliminating violence to all university academics

In the run up to the Presidential elections of 2019, the SLMA wrote to the three main presidential candidates to voice publicly their opposition to ragging and condemn all forms of violence in the universities. We released the letters to the press on the October 22, 2019, hoping the candidates would express their opposition to ragging vociferously at the political rallies
This letter hit the headlines in the very next edition of the Sunday Island on the October 27 in very bold print. The entire editorial of the very next edition of the Sunday Island of November 3, 2019 was devoted to ragging under the topic  “Ending university ragging.” A senior academic of the university responded to these articles with a full page reply, titled “Ragging in universities: An urgent National question”. This was published in The Island newspaper on the November 4, 2019.  
Thereafter, a follow up letter was also sent to the presidential aspirants indicating the modus operandi of ending violence in universities. This letter too was released to the press. The contents of the second letter are given below- 

1. Publicly condemn all forms of ragging and violence in universities 
2. Genuinely pledge to eliminate violence in universities 
3. Invite all Vice Chancellors and Deans to discuss atrocities in universities.
4. Develop a scheme of rewards for academics who actively denounce violence 
5. Ensure educational authorities are fully empowered to inquire, take actions and work with Police without interference
6. Enable the development of a robust victim protection system and witness protection system

This letter appeared in The Island of 17th November 2019 under the  title,      
“SLMA Expert Committee submits recommendations to end ragging”
Unfortunately, none of these letters received any response. Subsequently, the letter of congratulations to President Rajapakse on his appointment as the president and several requests to meet him to discuss controlling ragging, road deaths and drug dependence were of no avail.  Subsequently, with the emergence of Covid 19, the country wide lock down in March 2020 and the continued closure of universities, the momentum decreased and the activities of the expert committee ceased.

Recently, a new organisation, “Coalition against ragging” was founded by Dr. Tara de Mel and Prof Harendra de Silva. Recently, we met the former Minister of Education, Prof G. L. Peiris, who had openly voiced his opposition to ragging. He agreed to our proposals, but the never ending burden of Covid-19 has hampered all discussions with the relevant authorities to control ragging.

In conclusion, our contention is that  all universities should be centres of learning, creativity, innovation and dissemination of  knowledge. These hallowed institutions should certainly be free of violence, intimidation 
and harassment.
However, being realistic, in the present context, unless  the  university authorities take the bull by the horns, it may take a generation or two to bridge the gap between the  well-off and not-so-well-off, competency / incompetency  in English  and the disparity  between the  urban and rural students.

My parting words for the students are

1. Give a “Firm NO” to ragging
2. Agree that ragging should be eliminated completely
3. Do not be a silent victim of ragging
4. Do not be a silent witness to ragging of others.

Remember that each one of us has the responsibility to ensure that universities are safe and comfortable for all those who work and study in them. 

In 2019 SLMA wrote to the three main presidential candidates to voice publicly their opposition to ragging and condemn all forms of violence in the universities. Unfortunately, none of these letters received any response