Four lessons from Pakistan-China FTA for Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka is currently engaged in trade negotiations with China and five rounds of talks have taken place to date with the expectation of concluding discussions in mid-2017. Whilst such negotiations are ongoing, it would be prudent for Sri Lanka to examine the experience of one of its neighbours, Pakistan with its free trade agreement (FTA) with China to draw lessons before finalising the agreement. 
Like Sri Lanka, Pakistan shares an extensive cordial relationship with China. To deepen this bond, Pakistan signed an FTA with China in 2006, which came into effect in 2007. The agreement is divided into two phases, with Phase I ending in December 2012 and negotiations for Phase II beginning in July 2013. 
Under Phase I, China agreed to eliminate/reduce tariffs on 6418 product lines and Pakistan made similar concessions on 6711 product lines over a period of five years. Under Phase II, tariffs are to be removed on 90 percent of tariff lines and trade volume, covering substantially all trade. However, Pakistan and China have yet to embark on Phase II of duty reduction under the FTA despite a lapse of three years.
As of end-2013, bilateral trade equalled US $ 9,278 million, as compared to US $ 3,421.96 million in 2006 prior to the FTA being implemented, while the trade imbalance has grown in favour of China during this time (Figure 1). China has made substantial use of the FTA; it has managed to utilize 57 percent of the concessions under the FTA, compared to mere 5 percent in the case of Pakistan.

Lesson 1: Tariff concessions and exports post-FTA 
The tariff concessions extended to Pakistan appear to be generous at first glance (Table 1). However, nearly all top export products, including those in which Pakistan has a comparative advantage, China has awarded higher or equal tariff reductions to competing Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. 
For example, tariffs under the 100 percent concession category were reduced to 0 percent by China for Pakistan by 2011; these products accounted for more than 35 percent of the total products offered concessions by China to Pakistan under the FTA. However, the average tariffs levied by China on these products for ASEAN countries were also 0 percent.
Even though there has been an increase in Pakistan’s exports to China subsequent to the FTA, the growth of exports to China was also seen in products which were outside the scope of the FTA. In fact, many top exports of Pakistan to the world (and China) were placed in China’s ‘No Concession’ list. While China’s demand for these products was significant, Pakistan is currently contributing to less than one percent to China’s imports of these product lines.
China’s share in Pakistan’s overall exports remains below 10 percent while there has seen a significant increase in its shares in Pakistan’s overall imports. Post-FTA China became the second largest source of Pakistan’s imports contributing over 25 percent of the total imports of Pakistan excluding petroleum products.
One way to obtain better access to the Chinese market is for Pakistan to renegotiate concessions so that they are equal to or more generous than those provided to other suppliers. Moreover, Pakistan appears to have failed to maximize the FTA despite the tariff concessions by China. This may have been perhaps due to the fact that Pakistani businesses were not involved in the negotiation process. 
Thus, the first lesson to draw from the Pakistan-China FTA is that Sri Lanka needs to ensure it gets similar or better concessions compared to China’s FTA partners and to consult Sri Lankan businesses so that concessions negotiated are relevant to the interest of the country.

Lesson 2: Product coverage and utilization post-FTA
An analysis of the FTA by the Pakistan Business Council shows that even though 7,550 products (at eight-digit HS code) are covered under the FTA with China, Pakistan’s exports to China were concentrated in 350 product lines (Table 1). In the zero-rated tariff category, exports were recorded in 169 products out of the 2681 products eligible for duty concessions. 
Nearly 1400 products covered by the agreement recorded no exports from Pakistan to China or to the world. Conversely, concessions offered by Pakistan to China under the FTA appear to be more beneficial – both in terms of the coverage (number of product lines utilized) and variety of products (type of product lines utilized).
Of the 6803 products covered by the agreement and concession offered by Pakistan to China, imports from China were spread among 57 percent of the products (3800 products) and product utilization was more than 50 percent for the zero-rated goods. In the case of Pakistan, the utilization rates as was 5 percent for the zero duty items (350 items).
In this context, the second lesson for Sri Lanka would be to negotiate an FTA which includes products with high export potential as well as those which enjoy a comparative advantage against the rest of the world. Moreover, efforts should be geared towards diversifying the export basket and this could be facilitated by export-oriented foreign direct investments from China.   

Lesson 3: Trade imbalance 
The trade imbalance between Pakistan and China is a cause for concern, as it is in the case of bilateral trade with Sri Lanka. China, one of the fastest growing economies of the world with imports of over US $ 1.7 trillion, shares only US $ 2.6 billion of its market with Pakistan in 2011. 
The share of Pakistan’s exports to China is only 28 percent of its total trade in 2011; the figure has increased from 15 percent in 2006. However, China retains the position of main supplier of many top products Pakistan imports. Consequently, the trade gap with China nearly doubled from US $ 2.4 billion in 2006 to US $ 4.8 billion in 2011. 
The real challenge for Pakistan is not the trade imbalance per se but the unequal benefits that the two countries share because of the FTA. While exports have been increasing after the FTA, the loss of revenue to Pakistan is also increasing, offsetting any benefits that Pakistan is reaping from growth in exports. 
However, the problem of trade imbalance cannot be addressed by discouraging imports from China as Chinese imports are important for Pakistan and tariff concessions to China have enabled local manufacturers to obtain cheaper inputs. A study on Pakistan and China FTA by the Pakistan Business Council argues that Pakistan should focus on increasing its exports and expanding local production of sectors where the opportunity for trade exists to address the trade deficit, which is the third lesson for Sri Lanka. 
It is noted that many products that are zero rated for Pakistan are imported in large quantities by China from the rest of the world and hence, hold high potential for export growth if production/export is facilitated. 
A preliminary study by the Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka (IPS) regarding trade between Sri Lanka and China found  297  products  with  high  trade potential  to  China;  these  products  are currently  not  exported  by  Sri  Lanka  but are imported by China from elsewhere in the  world,  presenting  new  market opportunities for  Sri  Lankan exporters.
In this context, Sri Lanka should recognize the opportunity these new sectors present to boost local production and exports to China and obtain tariff concessions for these products. Growth in such exports could potentially offset any losses in revenue that Sri Lanka will incur from exemption of duties to China under the FTA.

Lesson 4: Protection of local industries
While the zero-rated category and other preferential tariff concessions to China have enabled Pakistan to import cheap raw material that is used in local production, tariff concessions to China under the FTA have also increased imports of finished products into the country. This has flooded the local market thereby lowering profitability and/or underutilized capacity of local producers in Pakistan.
According to Irshad et al (2017), as many as 10 cases of anti-dumping have been filed by local producers against Chinese products to the National Tariff Commission and subsequently, anti-dumping duties as high as 71 percent have been levied.
The study by the Pakistan Business Council recommends that Chinese imports, which have adversely affected the local producers as a consequence of the concessions offered by Pakistan, should be discouraged for a limited period of time (five years) so these industries could build up scale and competencies to compete. This would be the fourth lesson for Sri Lanka;  it too should be mindful of its tariff liberalization with China and identify sectors in the economy which may be adversely affected by opening up to China and provide a time-bound support to these vulnerable industries. 
Moreover, Sri Lanka should urgently enact legislations on anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard measures, which are temporary in nature to ease the transition toward freer trade and protect local industries against unfair trading practices/surge in imports.
(Dr. Janaka Wijayasiri is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka (IPS). To comment on the article, visit the IPS blog ‘Talking Economics’ – www.ips.lk/talkingeconomics)